GPTsApp SkillsCodex Reset
Menu
Codex Reset
← Back to results

community example · Study the method

performance-review-writer

Turn specific work contributions into a draft self-assessment, peer review or upward feedback.

github/awesome-copilotskills/performance-review-writer/SKILL.md

Read SKILL.md ↗Open source directory ↗

Before you use it

Input
Review type, subject, period and concrete contributions. The source offers a fallback using three to five user-supplied examples when WorkIQ is unavailable.
Expected output
A Markdown review draft with evidence context, gaps requiring detail and type-specific sections, for the user to edit and submit separately.
Prerequisites
Use only information you are authorized to review. WorkIQ is optional in the described workflow, not access supplied by this directory. Verify outcomes and remove unrelated confidential material before sharing a draft.

Client setup and runtime behavior are not verified here; client installation is not individually established. The use notes below describe source preparation, inputs and limits.

Publisher documentation, static file observations and environment tests are different kinds of evidence. Runtime behavior has not been observed.

Use this method

Source-based preparation, not an installation or a completed run. Nothing is executed here.

Good fit for
Preparing a review draft from actual contributions while retaining clear evidence gaps and human judgment.
Not for / limits
Not an employee score, promotion decision, automatic personnel review or submission service. Source instructions and the optional connector have not been executed here.
Prepare
Specify who the review concerns, the time period and the form's limits; assemble a small set of concrete work examples.
Apply
Use the structure matching self, peer or upward feedback and tie each contribution to an observable outcome. Mark unsupported details instead of filling them in.
Check
Review confidentiality, factual accuracy, balance and goals; edit the draft in your own voice and submit it through your own separate process.
Sources read for this note

These exact files were read as text at the displayed commit. Other files and external tools were not reviewed. A repository LICENSE observation does not confirm Skill-specific applicability or dependency rights.

Study the method

Compare the three review structures and the situation/task/action/result pattern. Missing evidence stays visible rather than being replaced with invented achievements or personality judgments.

1 files in the observed scope; 0 in scripts/, 0 in references/, 0 in assets/.

Directory evidence checked 2026-09-08T14:47:50.063Z. Filenames and folder counts were observed; in that earlier check, helper file bodies were not read or executed. Later individual reads, when present, are listed in the use notes.

Zero files in scripts/ does not mean no execution, network access or file writes. Markdown and other folders may describe or contain executable behavior.

Source version and requirements

Observed
2026-09-08T13:05:21.952Z
Source commit
f38fb6cf039b835990d0f49dc161d7c2af99ef69
Content SHA-256
0bec62e91b3698d3fb2089fd853d3ada8e07b6cbd4c355ae85e09bfd6ea34bc6
License
Unknown
Author attribution
Repository owner: github. Individual authorship is not independently established.

This page describes a pinned source snapshot, not the latest repository state. Changes after this commit have not been reconciled here. A repository license does not necessarily cover external models, datasets or services.

Open current repository ↗
Reference note and manual copy

Repository license evidence

MIT text was read in the nearest repository license file at this commit. Skill-specific applicability has not been confirmed. This is not a redistribution grant for the Skill or its external services.

Read observed license file ↗
License evidence checked
2026-09-08T14:47:50.063Z
License file SHA-256
e32449d23085399adc1222f7a17408b730550258e51627c153cb108ca9955823